Television Appearances by University Professors
The reading and lecture are both about professor appearing on the TV. The author of the reading feels that there are several reasons why professor should appear on the TV. The lecture challenges this point made by the lecturer. She is of the opinion that professor does not get any benefit from appearing in the Tv.
To begin with, the author argues that when professors appears on TV, he will get a reputation. In the article it says that viewer will understand and will have more idea about academic. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that professor might tend to get reputation among fellows. Additionally, she says that professor job is not for entertainment. To do so he might face difficult to get the money for research.
Secondly, the writers suggests that university will be benefit from professor coming LIVE in the tv. In the reading, it is said that university might receive positive comment and reviews, and university reputation would increase when someone from the university appears on the TV. The lecturer, however, rebut this by mentioning that to represent in the public it would take professor times, where he can used this time in the college with his students.
Finally, the author posits that it would be good chance for viewers to learn new knowledge. Moreover, it states that most of the public wouldn’t be in contact with professor. So, they can learn things from the TV. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that the professor show would be deeper into academic style, which public might find difficult to understand.
She notes that other anchor would be doing their homework on academic to present, so it wouldn't make any difference professor being on the TV.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-09 | YACHI PATEL | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 75 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 70
- Television Appearances by University Professors 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... why professor should appear on the TV. The lecture challenges this point made by t...
^^^
Line 4, column 406, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...ould take professor times, where he can used this time in the college with his stude...
^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... homework on academic to present, so it wouldnt make any difference professor being on ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93793103448 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59871915766 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503448275862 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3657044238 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2352941176 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277900182005 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928491361647 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914007225698 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160743386834 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929986689761 0.0443174109184 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.