The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012.
The bar chart illustrates the number of native students and foreign students who studied in Computer Science at a British university over a 3-year period, starting in 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of British home pupils was always higher than the number of international pupils who studied in Computer Science.
Looking at the data set of men in more details, it is evident that in the beginning of the time period, the number of native students was around 39, whereas the number of foreign students was the half of them. In 2011, the number of native students showed a gradual decline to approximately 24, but the number of international students was increased slightly to 23. At the end of the time period, both of the number of native and foreign students were increased gradually in a similar pattern, and that figure were about 42 and 39 respectively.
Turning to the women data set, it is clear that the number of international students was the lowest at a figure of around 14 in 2010, and then it was increased slowly in the following years. However, in 2011, the number of native students was increased from 32 to 44, after that at the end of the period, it was increased slightly and reached at the highest point to 50.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | erman..duran95 | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | Gurpreet__ | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | Darshandave810 | view | |
| 2021-07-14 | diwash999 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | Jyotikalsi | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 67
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment 67
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012 86
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 67
- The two diagrams are the maps of a library The first is of the library in 1990 and the seconds is of how it looks at present in 2017 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68778280543 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61895980724 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429864253394 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 18.0543397463 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 148.0 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277638658112 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158264273758 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101503962189 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205668559156 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117414016988 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.