TPO 16'' independent the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide
Whether traveling in companionship of a tour guide or not is a convoluted controversy and has been a matter of argumentation. On the one hand, some people believe that traveling alone is better inasmuch as the expenses are minimized as they are visiting everywhere individually, and they do not have to share anything. On the other hand, others claim that following a leader in a tour is more enjoyable owing to the fact that the trip will be memorable. In my point of view, I am inclined to the latter idea in spite of the fact that the former is more popular and has more aficionados among adults. My answer to this debating bone of contention is twofold.
The first and foremost reason which is worth mentioning is that tour leaders generally have a better insight of the destination; therefore, they are completely aware of intact locations which normally an individual cannot reach by themselves. To put it into a more vivid picture, three years ago, I had a trip to Rasht, one the most beautiful cities in north of Iran. Omitting the challenges of searching for landmarks, I decided to join a group led by one of the best tour leaders of Rasht. Ali, the tour leader, knew everything about the city; he bought us the best brainfreeze of the country in Khomam; then, we had a great time climbing the mountains in the countryside which I counld not even find by myself. Without obeying that seasoned leader, I could not have neither had fun nor seen those strange places.
The second and equally far-reaching explanation to bear in mind is that by following a leader in a trip, a person can easily decrease their expenses insomuch as a professional guide knows all discounts available in the destination's markets; moreover, they have mastered the routes of suburban locations which are reachable cheaply via public transportation. As an illustration, my cousin is a tour guide in Kerman, a city in the southeast of Iran. He knows which shops are on-sale at the end of the year. Additionally, he is exactly aware of the schedule of city buses going to the Lout desert and coming back from it. Thus, following him in an off-road trip into the desert would be more practical, as well as safer, than going alone despite the fact that you will be charged for a little amount of money.
In conclusion, taking all the aforementioned rationalizations into account, I personally uphold with this opinion that joining a group with an experienced tour leader is better than travelling alone, mainly because the leader knows the best intact locations of a city, especially if that city is historical. Furthermore, a satisfactory leader will optimise the expenses of the trip thanks to their well-established methods and approved relations in the destination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 76 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 83 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 73 | view |
- TPO 20 integrated let it burn policy affects the parks in three ways first it damages the trees and vegetation in parks second it kills wildlife third it has a negative affect on the local economy 80
- is it better to take courses with new professors or previous ones 88
- The article asserts that working in a four day workweek setting is extremely beneficial for both companies and employees However the lecturer completely disagrees with this idea and rejects all three reasons mentioned in the passage His opposite explanati 80
- agnostids behaviors 90
- TPO 37 independent agree or not because people are busy doing so many different thins they do very few things very well 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85774946921 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94671340516 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528662420382 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.2811668073 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.588235294 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7058823529 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143659283635 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479953238303 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645707774081 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870542263065 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240841663499 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.