TPO 16''- Integrated: the archaeology science is in danger in Britain because of three reasons
many artifacts were lost in construction projects
many professionals feel that financial support for their research is inadequate
it is difficult to have a career in this field.
The article asserts that nowadays archaeology major feces numerous difficulties in Britain. Nonetheless, the professor casts doubt on the presumptions made by the author. She endorses that new guidelines and rules have been adopted which changed this science and improved it in three areas.
First of all, the reading claims that new construction projects have destroyed and sabotaged the situations of many artifacts. However, the lecturer believes that the new guidelines force the construction companies to let the site be examined before any executions. Therefore, if anything valuable and interesting thing is found in the site, they must proceed to the next step which is the decision of local oficials as well as the archaeologists together about whether to preserve the findings or let the construction be done near to their location.
Secondly, the passage upholds that many archaeologists have been suffering from the inadequacy of funds in their major. On the other hand, the aducator overthrows this opinion, mainly because she insists that the new rules force the construction companies, not the government, to pay the archaeologists for any kind of work that must be done on their sites, such as the examinations. Thus, this is considered as a supportive plan for the archaeologists, and they can work on more sites thanks to this new income.
Tertiary, the author acknowledges that there are few job vacancies availabe for archaeologists, but the teacher refutes this idea due to the fact that she insists scores of paid jobs (mostly new) are defined for them throughout all stages of the processes of their major from pre-planning of the site to the processing of the data and writing academic articles. Therefore, today, the number of professional archaeologists is in it climax and they are offered myriad profitable positions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
- agnostids behaviors 90
- explanations about TLP 83
- TPO 06differences between online and traditional encyclopedias.online ones' information are inaccuratehackers can hack them easilythey do not have enough space so the focus is more on popular unimportant ideas. 88
- TPO 47 independent agree or nor it is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 90
- there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to him were actually painted by him.first there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed.second, this in this painting the elements of light and shadow do not fit toget 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uction be done near to their location. Secondly, the passage upholds that many ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2813559322 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06865612082 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.3220504562 49.2860985944 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.636363636 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0909090909 7.06452816374 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223004166016 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782091047089 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381086657091 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124194894611 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368184825051 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uction be done near to their location. Secondly, the passage upholds that many ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2813559322 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06865612082 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.3220504562 49.2860985944 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.636363636 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0909090909 7.06452816374 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223004166016 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782091047089 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381086657091 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124194894611 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368184825051 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.