The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption between 1955 and 2012.
The line graph compares the amount of money was spent on 4 different species (beef, pork, broilers, and turkey) in the US from 1955 to 2012.
Overall, spending on beef and pork remained relatively stable, in comparison with significant and steady rises in the figures for broilers and turkey, respectively over the period surveyed.
In the year 1955, the Americans spent nearly 60 pounds on beef consumption, while the figure for pork was slightly lower, at 50 pounds. Remarkably, over 6 years from 1955, there was no consumption in broilers and turkey. During the following 52 years, beef is significantly more popular than the others, and its consumption reached a peak of 90 pounds in 1976.
By 2012, pork had surpassed beef and dominated the market with being spent on approximately 55 pounds by the Americans, and spending on beef was down close to 50 pounds. In the same year, the figure for broilers was just over at 40 pounds, which was 4 times as much as that of turkey.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77058823529 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66467991157 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605882352941 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7657240511 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958929309632 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554502190826 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585014760428 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709612470527 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674527248985 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.