The graph compares the number of people who visited 5 attractions in Parkvale city between 1996 and 2016

Essay topics:

The graph compares the number of people who visited 5 attractions in Parkvale city between 1996 and 2016

The graph depicts compartment of attendance in Parkvale city’s attractions in period from 1996 to 2016.

Overall, one can observe that the National Gallery faced up a sharp increase after 2000, then the Indigenous Art Centre also saw a growth of visitors. At the same time, there had been a fall in amount of people who has visited the aquarium and zoo, while the museum attendance experienced stability untill the end of the research.

According to the line graph, both National Gallery and Indigenous Art Centre had undergone gradually in the same manner starting with approximately 300 and 0 continuously up to 2008 when they declined from their route, reaching the end with 950 and 300 respectively.

The State Zoo and aquarium started decreasing with 300 and 450 in 1996. Then, they also had a resembling trend until 2002, but by the end both of them ended up on about 100 visitors substantially. At the same time, there was a stability in amount of welcomed by museum attendees, so average number stood by 450 for the entire timescale of investigation.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-03-04 hackmond 89 view
2020-03-04 hackmond 100 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83313724812 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7962642674 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160401665877 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828303403833 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11711240474 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125510159857 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134572483225 0.0819641961636 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.