Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is argue that reading activity has more positive effects for children than watching TV or playing computer games. I totally agree with this idea.
First, reading stories from a book contributes to enhance children’s concentration. If children are able to improve their concentration, it will be particularly helpful in their academic career. For example, in high school, students have to learn at least five classes every day. Therefore, losing the concentration skill can lead to the distractions which can make students fail to many exams.
Second, books are instrumental to develop their imagination and creativity through reading books. Reading a stories from a book stimulates children’s brain to imagine the characters, the background while children normally just access many images, programs and stories in the television or games as true without any efforts of little imagination. Moreover, the development of creativity paves the way for many different doors to future careers, such as directors and fashion designers.
Last but not least, the most importance of reading to children is knowledge of many other fields. For instance, children can easily get an all-round understanding of world around them through reading science books. In term of history, books attract many interests of young people via many interesting stories and stimulate the imagination of children rather than many films or games. Furthermore, games and television are full of advertisements these days and sometimes, have some inappropriate content for children. This makes it even more difficult for people to absorb information and knowledge effectively.
In conclusions, although playing games and watching television have many entertainment values, I believe that reading books has more benefits, including fostering imagination and creativity, gaining the knowledge and developing the concentration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-05 | Chang_highlight | 39 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries line bar 67
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 67
- The table below gives information about the value NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 72
- Some people think that news has no connection with people s lives so it is a waste of time to read newspaper and watch television news programmes Do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows Long Term International Migration in UK 1999 2008 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
It is argue that reading activity has more positive...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a story' or simply 'stories'?
Suggestion: a story; stories
...eativity through reading books. Reading a stories from a book stimulates children’s brain...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...lopment of creativity paves the way for many different doors to future careers, such as direct...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72438162544 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11009872923 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60777385159 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1551026671 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345913947757 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109221199724 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850790458583 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195662204873 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062044954939 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.