The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
The provided line graph compares four sectors in terms of the amount of acid rain emissions produced by them over the period of 17 years in England. As is observed, the total amount of acid rain emissions saw a swift decline from 1991 to 2007.The most dramatic decrease was witnessed in electricity, gas and waste supply sector.
At the beginning of the period shown, the highest amount of waste came from electricity, gas and waste supply sector with 3,5 million tones As opposed to electricity, gas and waste supply area, domestic, transport and communication sectors produced well under one million tone. Other industries were responsible for just over two million tones.
In 2007, electricity, gas and waste supply fell speedily to only 0,5 million tone, a drop of about three millions. While domestic and other industries progressively reduce, there was a small growth in transport and communication sector, reaching a peak of one million tone in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-27 | lattethuc | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | Hanabi | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-26 | @annie3010 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | Trần Chí Hiển | view | |
| 2022-01-23 | moyonakako | 80 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 73
- Topic The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 60
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...s saw a swift decline from 1991 to 2007.The most dramatic decrease was witnessed in...
^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sport and communication sectors produced well under one million tone. Other indus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15286624204 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74471303288 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59872611465 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0685535929 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.833333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210735510875 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109374395188 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631360198119 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150943323085 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788381399058 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.