People who hold high expectations for others are rewarded with high performance and respect.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and /ore examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Not all the people are able to recognize a talent or just a quality of another one and to give all their support in order to see help their pupils. However, because of the increasing competition in sportive and working scenes a figure who help others in the growth while strongly believing in them is even more appreciated and is becoming fundamental. They are not only loved by the ones they are helping but also by the whole society.
Firstly, the person that succeed in gaining the results wanted for so long will be glad to his supporter for all of his life. As a matter of fact, many of us are not able to hold on and continue fighting for their dreams by themselves. For this reason, everybody should need to have someone beside that ,even in the worst moments, motivates them to keep going in order to achieve his beloved goals. For instance, many talented football player when they are asked about their career and about how they were able to become that good, they start talking about their first supporter and about how much he has been important for them.
Furthermore, people who hold high expectation for others are openly admires even from external people. Even if it can be argued that they are just favoriting one single person, they provide benefits to all the people who are related to him. Thus, in a world where competition is becoming crueler and crueler people who has the chance to assist to acts of fraternity always get inspired from that. As a consequence, they feel grate for these people and try to do the same thing on others.
In conclusion, people who try to see potential not just in themselves but also in others are deeply admired by everyone since they are not just acting for the improvement of one single person but for the evolution of the whole society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-03 | elisabetta_fedele | 50 | view |
| 2020-04-03 | elisabetta_fedele | 50 | view |
- In recent years many prestigious American colleges have developed substantial and often highly structured core curricula A core curriculum is a sequence of thematically focused interdisciplinary courses that are obligatory for all students These courses a 80
- So long as they are aware of the dangers involved adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 50
- Imagine that you have received some land to use as you wish How would you use this land Use specific details to explain your answer 72
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... should need to have someone beside that ,even in the worst moments, motivates the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, talking about, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6199376947 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38137899675 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532710280374 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5308545813 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.583333333 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 5.21951772744 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131646060555 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565699430738 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510210486403 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849733789423 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383614201329 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.