The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country
The two pie charts depict how much disposable income(earnings excluding house rent on purchase) is spent by low and high-income groups on similar items but in different proportions.
Firstly, regarding the low-income group, the highest proportion of money is spent on food and drinks - 29 percent, compared to just 15 percent for the high-income group. This is closely followed by a quarter of the total proportion paid out on fuel bills, which contrasts with a much lower figure for this item for the affluent group(only 7%).
Interestingly, with respect to the high earners, the most popular item is recreation and cultural activities - around one-fifth of the total while it is half of that for the lower ones. The higher groups also spend a much higher proportion than the lower-income group on restaurants and hotels(12 percent and 4 percent respectively). The proportion of expenditure on clothing for the two groups is very similar, with only one percent difference between the two(six percent for the high group people and 5 for the lower ones).
Overall, it can be seen that the major proportion of the lowers income is attributed to food & drinks and fuel bills, while that of the high-income group has a more balanced spending pattern. Notably, both of these groups have the least spending on clothing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-22 | Delime | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | Awadhesh Mourya | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | sonicmaster | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-07 | longpm2k | 42 | view |
| 2020-04-03 | Jocelyn | 78 | view |
- Do you feel it is better for young people leaving school to study further at university or go straight into the workplace 73
- These days many countries help other countries by giving free food medical or other aid What are the benefits and drawbacks of this for countries that give and receive 73
- Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Explain why you would like the job Give details of why you would be suitable person to employ Say how you wou 81
- The graph below shows the town of Brindell and local areas in 1800 1900 and 2000 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8416725159 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7667302593 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.25 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204873934857 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101326769702 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629945103901 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145597232554 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562795396663 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.