Some people say that schools should spend more money on computers, others say that more money should be spent on teachers' wages. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Since last decade schools have been approaching various techniques in the way they teach lessons to their students and learning through computer is one among them. Few say that buying more and more computers by schools is appropriate than spending money on salaries for their school teachers. According to me, I strongly opine that a teacher with a lot of experience makes a difference than relying on human made equipment.
First of all, a teacher can manage and control the classroom more effectively and diligently. They make constant effort to sit and work with a child’s disability in various subjects, specially the tough once like mathematics and science. Furthermore, teachers can modify the theoretical lessons into practical one for better understanding of the subject which boosts the learning environment more interesting for children. For instance, subjects like physics can be taught in an open playground than in closed classrooms. Therefore, schools should appreciate and encourage their teaching staff by paying salaries than looking for their replacement for teaching.
However, I see no harm for schools spending so much money on equipment like computers because these computers improve student cognitive skills. Due to availability of free online courses, any lesson can be learnt by children on their own without anyone’s help. For example, last summer my youngest brother who was in 9th grade learnt how to build an application on a mobile phone. It was a huge surprise for us and my parents appreciated the school principal for introducing him to the computer.
Therefore, to sum up I see both teachers and computers have their respective roles in school curriculum, but I am strongly recommend paying wages to school teachers rather than spending more money on computer labs as they also come with a lot of limitations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-05 | Shraddanand | 51 | view |
- Some people say that technologies like mobile phones are disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people say that schools should spend more money on computers others say that more money should be spent on teachers wages Discuss both views and give your opinion 51
- Some people say that technologies like mobile phones are disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people say that technologies like mobile phones are disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 78
- It Is Better For Young People To Get Advice From Old People Than Young Ones 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... on salaries for their school teachers. According to me, I strongly opine that a teacher with a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'recommended'.
Suggestion: recommended
...in school curriculum, but I am strongly recommend paying wages to school teachers rather ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28040540541 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88689697139 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3530047991 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228506289214 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804500267329 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945821512343 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155257169268 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681161878914 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.