A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety Therefore, some people think that government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits. To what extent you agree?
In many parts of he world today, folks have FRETTED ABOUT governments. It is hypothesized that there will probably be more aids to human if governments invest in guards rather than social issues. This essay attempts to point out that this statement is persuadable.
There have been numerous folks who are in favor of the idea. First and foremost, securities of nations deems to be the most crucial elements in dwellers. It is fathomed that diverse aspects which relate to economy, financial issues and the like will in all probability be sabotaged if governors spontaneously do not stem risks of assaults from other nations. From this point, inhabitants can gain more obstacles in their lives. As highlight for this point, according to data from historical museums in Vietnam, the final royal reign of this nation reluctantly vanished in virtue of the fact the tactics of this organization merely paid attention about social problems of dwellers. From this point, the citizens in this period compulsorily endure tough situations due to wars. Another possibility is that numerous nations have attained the successful goals of creating weapons. Concretely, nuclear weapons which deem to be the most powerful weapon are entailed by diverse nations. It is understood that governments will be wisdom if they become peers of other nations about these sides. Indeed, many nations have perceived frightened of the outdated weapons of their countries so that they have determined to enormously invest in these sides. This tactic deems to be apt to folks due to the fact that nations will probably have adequate abilities to assault others if wars are triggered.
Vice versa, various folks did not support the ideas in some ways. One of them is that the tenet of most countries in these days tend to sustain the peace of the globe. Governors of nations recognize the detrimental issues of wars, so they have strove their best in order to reinforce the relationships with other nations. A case in this point, in various CNN articles, the president of the USA and the leader of South Korea have signed diverse contracts which enhance the connections of these nations, although South Korea is a nation which trigger deleterious impacts to most countries. However, it is vital for the leaders of nations to wind down in order to avoid the wars. According to these factors, governments have more scope to enrich societies.
In short, the statements have been demonstrated to be veracious by aforementioned elements. However, the contrast thesis cannot be denied in some ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-31 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | lamtrann | 11 | view |
| 2017-06-10 | MinhNgoc 299 | 93 | view |
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times even on holidays Does this development have more advantage than disadvantages 67
- Some people think that computer skills should be made as fourth skill in education To what extent do you agree 67
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a negative or positive development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'strived', 'striven'.
Suggestion: strived; striven
...etrimental issues of wars, so they have strove their best in order to reinforce the re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09026128266 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71249755452 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515439429929 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5027128358 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4090909091 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1363636364 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 7.06120827912 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0501437605032 0.244688304435 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0179432470826 0.084324248473 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242397976885 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0360993865214 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107224776538 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.