"Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using Facebook as a means of online instruction. You may compare with other tools like zoom, etc. Relevant examples of your own experience can be included."
Due to the unexpected Covid-19 outbreak, Vietnamese students had to reluctantly free from school or university, and started studying online. Therefore, Facebook is also considered as an effective tool to implement online learning. It helped millions of students access to knowledge without necessarily going to school.
This trend would create certain benefits but there will also be some drawbacks.
Facebook is an enormous communication platform in the world, and so it easily to become a potential means of interaction between lecturers and students. The students can join private groups of their teachers, and they will receive the notifications about assignments immediately. If some of them are shy when asking questions about lessons, they will do that easily on Facebook. Moreover, Online learning through Facebook requires less of a time investment. This generally involved the time get back and forth to classes, plus the time spent waiting for other students. Furthermore, It not only creates the flexible schedule and environment, but also lower costs and debts. For instance, students choose their own space to study like bedroom, coffee shop, local gym, and library. In like manner, Students pay less money for transportations, boarding houses, dormitories and parking fees than traditional studying.
Although studying through Facebook has many benefits, it also reveals several disadvantages. The most serious disadvantages is little or no face-to-face interaction. Since students don't have to physically present in a classroom, it maybe nearly impossible for them to enlarge social skills which will become vital competence for future jobs. Another negative aspect of studying through Facebook is plagiarism or cheating. Students easily to cheat by thousands of information on Facebook, or copy ideas from their friend's assignments. Finally, It is really difficult to check the attendance. It can be easier if teachers check the absence by Zoom or Google Meeting because of their camera features.
In conclusion, It cannot be denied that Facebook gets a huge contribution to studying online. It broadens the interaction from everywhere, but it also creates some drawbacks. Obviously, It can be an essential means to study temporarily, but cannot replace traditional studying permanently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-05 | lethithuydi4b1 | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-04 | Thi Bình Phạm | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-21 | Thanh Thanh 001 | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that children s leisure activities must be educational otherwise they are a complete waste of time Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 95
- Task 1 11
- Test 1 11
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include and relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 84
- After high school a choice that many students have to make is whether to go to college and university or not The decision that will give people the better opportunity to have a more successful life is to go to college and university In most people s opini 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ace-to-face interaction. Since students dont have to physically present in a classro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63896848138 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03948395923 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618911174785 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6432781422 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8636363636 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131412567368 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036827242962 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316361641116 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678331830663 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230124354885 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.