Some people consider price as the most important thing to think about when buying a product (such as a cell phone) or service (e.g. medical treatment). Do you agree or disagree?
A question which many of us have to ask ourselves is whether the quality of products is really worthwhile for the amount of valuable money from our pocket. On one hand, I am inclined to believe that as an individual gains momentary knowledge and gradually begins to truly understand the basic concept of finance, he will make better decisions in terms of spending habits. On the other hand, hardly can we deny the downside effects still last until we know how to deal with product prices.
To assess the crucial advantage of being knowledgeable of the value of money, we must bring the skillsets of personal finance into focus. Assuming a person was educated eminently about how to purchase intellectually , he would be better and be able to manage to avoid the struggle of lacking money. Not only can he sharpen the financial management skill but he will also escape away from wasting money on broken-down products. In addition, that person can develop a good shopping habit without hesitating whether the special product is indispensable or not. Another important angle that is commonly ignored is the price absolutely displays the social status of buyers.
Although so far, one can readily draw the conclusion that consideration of the bill is critical, we must put this case into perspective before judging whether it is a minor problem or not. Living in modern society and having a lot of problematic matters to solve, we appear to be silly or juvenile to suppose that we do need to comprehend the number of money we have to pay for and become extremely tired of it. For instance, since virtually every retailer shops or malls have commanded their product prices and sustain margins, we do not have to be anxious about that matter anymore. On top of that, always having customer care policy from companies or government organizations to support buyers whenever they are stuck to cope with receiving faulty devices or being tricked to buy something over its price.
Taking both sides into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that in principle, being aware of the important value of money can be useful for everyday life aspects, but in practical, people do not have to focus on it anymore.
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power and wind power Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tly about how to purchase intellectually , he would be better and be able to mana...
^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout how to purchase intellectually , he would be better and be able to manage to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90133333333 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68776022038 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.3276875827 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.384615385 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8461538462 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0791137136403 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300804013845 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287934989527 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0496812606282 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015378647344 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.