To what extent
Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
Universities have always played a significant role in shaping a well-educated society. Considerable part of the population reckons that academic students should learn a comprehensive range of study fields rather than a limited number of disciplines. Although I agree with the positive aspects of learning MASTERING wide range of subjects, I cannot help disagreeing with this perspective.
From one point of view, people should HANDLE a broad spectrum of disciplines in order to obtain a wide outlook. Nowadays to be BEING a professional is not enough to be a great leader. Through broadmindedness multiplied by knowledge ONLY, a person can be a motivational manager enhancing subordinates. Increasing number of programmes in business schools related to culture reaffirms the idea of the importance of lateral thinking. For instance, during the last year all russian business schools established the faculty of art to educate the business community in this field. Thus, I consider that providing a full range of subjects DEMONSTRATES positive features for the students.
From another point of view, students enter University to OBTAIN a specific specialization which should be the VERY focus throughout their studying time. They need to concentrate on specific subjects which are relevant to their future career. ONES DO NOT HAVE TO to be disturbed with WHAT they do not benefit in the long run. WHEN|WHILE Searching for a job after graduation, students’ relevant knowledge and abilities are believed to be crucial factors for success. For example, RUSSIAN statistics of 2019 show that 95% of headhunters CONSIDER the professional background only, IGNORING hobbies and personal interest. Therefore, universities should prioritize specific subjects for the curriculum, otherwise, irrelevant topics will be an obstacle for the students to apply for the jobs.
To conclude, though we can not deny the benefits of studying a wide variety of areas, I personally believe that the objective of universities is to provide specialized knowledge to their pupils which are relevant to their career in the future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-04-29 | Sakhalinochka | 78 | view |
2020-04-27 | Sakhalinochka | 78 | view |
2020-04-27 | Sakhalinochka | 84 | view |
- Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 78
- Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 78
- To what extent Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 84
- Many universities charge higher fees for foreign students Why do they do this Do you believe that it is fair Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 51
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole in shaping a well-educated society. Considerable part of the population reck...
^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee with the positive aspects of learning MASTERING wide range of subjects, I can...
^^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to master'.
Suggestion: To master
...with the positive aspects of learning MASTERING wide range of subjects, I cannot help ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...positive aspects of learning MASTERING wide range of subjects, I cannot help di...
^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to obtain a wide outlook. Nowadays to be BEING a professional is not enough to b...
^^
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in a wide outlook. Nowadays to be BEING a professional is not enough to be a gre...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: TO
...o their future career. ONES DO NOT HAVE TO to be disturbed with WHAT they do not bene...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 965.302439024 185% => OK
No of words: 325.0 196.424390244 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49230769231 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16362461586 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 106.607317073 176% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 283.868780488 196% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0684927134 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221716778899 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656526861102 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533956650439 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119710418872 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563678212814 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 40.7170731707 275% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.