There is no need to maintain a close relationship with distant relatives.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Mankind has been gathering in communities and groups since the earth origin to survive constant wars and give birth to a new generation. The issue of whether folks should have frequent and in depth contacts with members of their genealogical tree is often argued by all of us. I completely agree with the above-mentioned statement due to the reasons described below in my essay
Firstly, the existence of in-laws in a person’s life should not create by default a burden that prompts to sustain warm connections. Eventually, growing up (while maturing) humans start to form their inner circle on the basis of similar interests, spirit of harmony and friendship. Commonly, the ties of kinship does not organically create sense of cohesion, climate of amity and mutual trust, the lack of which could lead siblings to distance. For example, my uncle had close bond to the family until he converted to another religion, immigrated to Canada, which negatively affected our relationship. Thus, similar DNA should be a meaningful factor for adults to sustain and preserve communion in absence of mutual respect and amicability.
Secondly, communication on decent level is time consuming, requires massive efforts and sacrifices, which could be justified only in cases of pure love and respect between family members. It is logical to assume that labor pressure and domestic chores limit individuals to a significant extent from participation in social life. Actually, a man of legal age, engaged in full-time employment, spends a small percentage of daily schedule even with closest people, let alone distant relatives. For instance, results of survey, conducted by Nielsen, indicates that Christmas time – the only date in a year for 69% of Frenchmen to reach estranged kinfolks. Hense, high pace of life and constant responsibilities make it hardly possible for a grown up to interact with remote household amicably
In conclusion, taking into account all mentioned above, I’m convinced that persons tied by blood can not be encouraged to love and respect each other if connection does not create positive reaction especially in current era of overburdening.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-09 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 61 | view |
2023-08-05 | UNB ADMIRAL | 89 | view |
2023-08-05 | UNB ADMIRAL | 71 | view |
2023-07-26 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
2023-07-26 | oanhlilies | 56 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- For a long time art has been considered an essential part of all cultures in the world However nowadays people s values have changed and we tend to consider science technology and business more important than arts What do you think are the causes of this 89
- The most important aim of science ought to be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree
- Some people say that international sporting events contribute greatly to peace and stability in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is commonly thought that it is healthy for adults to maintain an outside interest in order to relax or stay fit Compare the advantages and disadvantages of 3 of the following sports and pastimes tennis walking museums a club a gym Give reasons for your 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 344 350
No. of Characters: 1767 1500
No. of Different Words: 231 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.307 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.137 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.843 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 108 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.586 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.308 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.047 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5