The given graph provide the statistic of online using on different items in 5 countries in 2017
The given graph provide the statistic of online using on different items in 5 countries in 2017.
Overall, games had the most attractive with user on the internet. The proportion of online using of Malaysia had the most highest.
The data of user games in Malaysia reached a peak of 32.14%, 3.32% more than the percentage of that of China. The figure people for liking games in Japan, Iraq, India was nearly the similar at 16.36%, 18.80% and 15.77% respectively.
The statistic of netizens using music and book in 5 countries had low. The proportion of user listening music had the highest in 5 countries with 9 %. On the other hand, the percentages of people of music in other countries had low which that was fluctuated from 5.4% to 6.63%. The data of people using online books was the lowest in 5 countries. The proportion of people reading book on the internet of Iraq was 1.98 %, 2.75 % less than the data of that of Malaysia. Japan and Indian’s figure for user reading book online had the similar, which was respectively 3.20% and 3.22%. The rate of netizens reading book online of China had 2.21%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-06 | bichnguyen | 67 | view |
- The given graphs illustrate the figure for market share and trade of top 6 PCs vendors around the world in 2018 We can see that market share was directly proportional with trade of brands technology On the other hand Lenovo has the highest percentages in 67
- The given graph provide the statistic of online using on different items in 5 countries in 2017 67
- The given column graph illustrates wage for staff of 06 aeronautical companys in 2018 67
- The given line graph illustrates the figure of clients in some restaurants in Vietnam in 2019 67
- The given pie graph illustrates the rate of people of fitness center is Oslo Norway in 2010 and 2015 Overall the proportion of membership taking part in a fitness center had changed between 2010 and 2015 On the other hand the young people had growth up pe 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...ion of online using of Malaysia had the most highest. The data of user games in Malaysia r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'game'.
Suggestion: game
...ad the most highest. The data of user games in Malaysia reached a peak of 32.14%, 3...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e than the percentage of that of China. The figure people for liking games in Japa...
^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of that of China. The figure people for liking games in Japan, Iraq, India was n...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
....36%, 18.80% and 15.77% respectively. The statistic of netizens using music and b...
^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... music and book in 5 countries had low. The proportion of user listening music had ...
^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f people of music in other countries had low which that was fluctuated from 5.4% ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72164948454 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48581743284 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474226804124 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0614522502 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.3333333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2641676626 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139447792048 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.266787477098 0.0843802449381 316% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301590529845 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.405767818938 0.0819641961636 495% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.