The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The graph gives data about the proportion of tourists who came to England and paid a visit to four different attractions in Brighton from 1980 to 2010
Overall, the number of tourists visited the Pavilion and Pier increased, while the festival and art gallery became less popular for tourists over an a-20-year period.
It can be seen from the line graph that in 1980, Pier was the least common among tourists, at only 10%. However, it experienced an upward trend and the percentage of tourists was doubled in 2010. In contrast, the proportion of people who visited the Art Gallery decreased significantly by approximately 10% after reaching its peak of nearly 40% in 1985.
Over the same period, the Pavilion witnessed a sharp increase in the number of visitors, from over 20% in 1980 to nearly 50% in 1995 which was the highest point of the whole graph. Throughout the remainder period, there was a noticeable decline of 20%. In 1980, the festival was the most popular attraction. However, it fell moderately from 30% to 28% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 78
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 85
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83516483516 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62731602937 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.5786556866 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232166724627 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767387109067 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106132130732 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170145525793 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152691256343 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.