It is believed that the extinction of some animals is part of natural processes, and therefore it is no reason for people to prevent it. Do you agree or disagree? give your own opinions
Some animals are no longer living in the earth because of the natural process. However, the idea that allowing the extinction of other species will make our planet suffer in the long run. In this essay, Reasons wi be fully illustrated.
To begin with, animals play an important role in our world, and the decline of their numbers will severely affect the eco chain. For example, bees serve as pollen carrier for the spreading plants and even growth of crops. Without the transmission of pollen, the yield of crops will be largely reduced, which can bring a chain reaction including famine and poverty, and this will not only worsen our environments but also jeopardise the balance of nature. Additionally, the exiting of carnivores can control the number of herbivores, which will prevent the grassland ground soil to be destroyed by these species such as sheep or deers, avoiding desertification.
Another reason why other species are becoming endangered is that human's activities such as land developments and city expansions. People should take more responsibilities to rebuild the home for these animals. With an increasing number of researches and studies, scientists are getting more and more familiar with the restorations of wildlife, and this can significantly help the mass to understand the importance of wild spices, encouraging more people to participate in wild species conservation. As a consequence, this can greatly maintain the diversity of ecology.
In conclusion, animals have equal rights as human kinds to enjoy their life in the world. Human societies have to raise awareness of protecting every life in the land of earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-18 | CharleneAKL | 78 | view |
- Some wild animals are disappeared as a natural process It is believed that people have no reason to protect animals Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion 78
- It is believed that the extinction of some animals is part of natural processes and therefore it is no reason for people to prevent it Do you agree or disagree give your own opinions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also jeopardise the balance of nature. Additionally, the exiting of carnivores ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24528301887 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91152556782 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1603915787 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.923076923 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113476944552 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445928572086 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579238349026 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712181121051 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565814592259 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.