Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are
played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in
individual sports like tennis or swimming is better.
Sport has been a field arousing public attention for decades. Many residents have recognized that the advantages brought about by team sports are more numerous, whereas opponents of this idea prefer participating in individual sports.
On the one hand, there is a discernible plus for which sports with single players are appreciated. Indeed, taking up individual disciplines, to fulfill their inherent aspiration for victory, participants must shoulder a wide variety of responsibilities by themselves, ranging from strategy development, injury recovery to fitness regime planning. Moreover, during tournaments, it is also only on their own will challenge posed by opponents be tackled. As a result, it can be deduced that individual sports honor individualism, in which the more regularly citizens get involved, the more likely they are to be independent. By contrast, if people compete in team sports, they may have dilemmas dealt by others, leading to a lack of problem-solving skills.
On the other hand, some residents believe that collective sports are beneficial because of two major reasons. Firstly, regarding to participants, team disciplines play an important role in fostering interpersonal skills. Specifically, interaction between teammates may instill a whole array of positive traits, contributing to good team players who can prevent breakdown in communication or motivate others to strive. Secondly, regarding to the community, another advantage stems from collective disciplines’ ability to strengthen solidarity. In particular, playing as a team obviously brings residents into contact, and this is expected to act as a catalyst for developing mutual sympathy. For example, when the entire South Africans celebrated their victory at World Rugby Championship 1995, the triumph was deemed as a milestone after which race discrimination was totally eradicated.
Briefly, while gains contributed by individual sports are remarkable, there are also a number of reasons for which some people have an inclination towards collective disciplines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 888, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... discrimination was totally eradicated. Briefly, while gains contributed by indi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ination towards collective disciplines.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, whereas, while, as to, for example, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79605263158 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2816683713 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664473684211 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8196014801 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23716652658 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710057649445 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545300758378 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14190430281 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312231049108 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.