The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999
The provided line graph depicts the information of thefts per thousand vehicles in Great Britain,Sweden,France and Canada between 1990 and 2000
As it is presented in the line graph, in 1990 Great Britain had the highest number of thefts of vehicles which was recorded around 20 thousands.In the following year it witnessed topsy furry trend and reach at 15 thousand in1999 whereas in Sweden experienced an exponential inclination jumped at 14 thousands
In case of France in 1990 solten vehicles which was recorded around 6 thousand.In the later year it remain stable between 5 to 7 thousand Lastly in Canada the ratio of stole car show downfall declined to 5 thousand but in next 5year it rises to similar position from where it was started
Overall,it is explicitly seen that Great Britain suffered the highest number of vehicles theft throughout the whole period however Canada and France experienced almost similar ratio which was least in the given four countries .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Daisy Ho | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-09-03 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that government should not spend too much money on the outer space exploration do you agree or disagree 49
- The charts below show the amount of area used for growing grains between 1990 and 2010 in state in canada 63
- The charts below show the amount of area used for growing grains between 1990 and 2010 in state in canada 10
- The charts show information about the number of kilometres traveled in a average year and the distribution of vehicles type in Britain 56
- The graphs shows the Cost for watching movies and change in market share of three different ways of watching movies 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Sweden
...s per thousand vehicles in Great Britain,Sweden,France and Canada between 1990 and 2000...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...,France and Canada between 1990 and 2000 As it is presented in the line graph, in...
^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... which was recorded around 20 thousands.In the following year it witnessed topsy f...
^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...es which was recorded around 6 thousand.In the later year it remain stable between...
^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'remains'?
Suggestion: remains
... around 6 thousand.In the later year it remain stable between 5 to 7 thousand Lastly i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...milar position from where it was started Overall,it is explicitly seen that Great...
^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...tion from where it was started Overall,it is explicitly seen that Great Britain s...
^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ch was least in the given four countries .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, lastly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12578616352 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90526865152 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 159.0 22.4926829268 707% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 815.0 112.824112599 722% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 159.0 22.9334400587 693% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 33.0 5.23603664747 630% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367265035146 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.367265035146 0.103423049105 355% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225651761395 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101069816214 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 82.2 13.2329268293 621% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -81.45 61.2550243902 -133% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.1 10.3012195122 622% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.66 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.3 8.06136585366 190% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 65.6 10.9970731707 597% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.