A review of the tool for learning English

Essay topics:

A review of the tool for learning English

The new writing tool known as Write and Improve helps learnining English. This essay will give a personal review of this tool after using. It is clear that the tool is significantly useful to improve English skills of users.
Although the tool is free, its quanlity is really good. Moreover, it can indicate typos as well as suggest better ways to fix essays. Because of these functions, it is very useful for leaners, and they can increase English skills themselves, especially in writing. Many users achieved better scores of English creficitations after training with this tool.
The tool is very convenient, because I can use anytime as well as anywhere via the internet. Thus, it help me to save much time, instead of joining face-to-face classes. It also keeps the log of my learning history, that can help me to visualize my progress. Furthermore, the tool reminds to practice by following the schedule of the training process. This process gives me the particular schedule to get my outcome.
In a nutshell, this tool is very useful for learners, who want to improve their English skills. I am very grateful that the author of Writve and Improve serves freely for all users.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-11 themthihua view
2021-09-10 Krystal03102003 view
2020-06-30 layse 56 view
2020-06-30 layse 56 view
2019-05-27 Kien Trung Nguyen 11 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
... as anywhere via the internet. Thus, it help me to save much time, instead of joinin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'practicing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'remind' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: practicing
...progress. Furthermore, the tool reminds to practice by following the schedule of the traini...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 201.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90049751244 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63976180133 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 176.041082164 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 506.74238477 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.4986879975 49.4020404114 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.3571428571 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3571428571 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337132728395 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101528822924 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709784401936 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192413067692 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673500573212 0.056905535591 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.