Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure everything is correct.
As time goes on, more and more competitions exist in different places in the world. The work efficiency directly represents people’s competitiveness in the competitions from different aspects, no matter in school or society. Among these competitions, the most controversial topic is that it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure everything is correct. In my opinion, I disagree with this perspective of view.
Finishing the work quickly for the sake of finish it will let the work lose its significance and value. No matter in which career, doing works correctly will always be the priority, even though it will cost lots of time. Doing works is the way for people to practice their skill and ability on different aspect. If people only put their attention on speed but not quality, they will not have a good feed back at the end; moreover, it may cause some unreversed damage to people. For example, the technicians whose work is to build the spacecraft and rocket. The reason why that the single program will take a magnificent of time to do is not only because the rocket is overly huge for them to build, but people also need long time to check everything that they made is right and accurate, which in order to insure the astronauts’ live security. Thus, to work slowly and make sure everything is correct is more important than to work quickly and bear the risk of mistake.
Secondly, doing things slowly to make sure everything is correct can develop the good attitude and ability of a person. Master says : “Details determine success or failure”. Doing things slowly can help people to capture more details and find more mistake they made during the work; therefore, people can finish their work more beautifully and successfully. Moreover, by the time went on, people will do more and more works; in this way, their ability will be on the rise, same as their stable attitude towards every work.
However, we should not prejudice against that working quickly and risk making mistakes will save a bunch of time, but the time it cost for the mistake fixation after finishing the work will be no much shorter than the other way do. Also, the benefits of doing work slowly which discussed above are definitely unparalleled to doing work quickly. In conclusion, people should better doing their work carefully to keep the accuracy instead of doing work quickly with low accuracy.
- Which one do you think makes friendship stronger enjoying good times together or talking about problems and supporting each other 98
- Following the world s development the relationship between people are become better we usually get on well with teachers As we all know because everyone will make mistakes we may find the teachers view contradicts to our view when attending a class or a m 70
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently, while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement There is never a good reason to be impolite rude to other people 73
- governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic games 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...xation after finishing the work will be no much shorter than the other way do. Als...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8896882494 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58209344637 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501199040767 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.412142531 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.277777778 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4581722703 0.236089414692 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169459601632 0.076458572812 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165284415392 0.0737576698707 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327221810164 0.150856017488 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618167740919 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.