TPO-53
In the lecture, speaker challenges all the reasons provided in the reading material regarding benefit of high taxation on unhealthy food and cigarett.
First, in the reading the author claims that this extra taxes on cigarret and unhealthy food discourages people from using them. However, the lecturer refutes that by saying it not necessarily lead to discouragement. Some consumers might still use the product and because of higher expense use the cheaper and lower quality which is more harmful. This reaction might have greater health consecuenses. In unhealthy food consumer this might be even worse as they might continue buying unhealthy food and because of more expense, not have enough money for buying the other healthy food and would not benefit from this policy.
Also, the reading states that extra taxes are fair because these people use more medical expenses. However, fairness depends on the earning and income. People with high income and higher earning are less affected by extra taxes and the burden would be more on the low income and lower earning people which challanges the idea of fairness.
Finally, although the government revenue would increase by this extra taxes as the reading explained very well, this might not be a good thing. Government would be dependent on the revenue from these taxes and might not be forceful enough for banning policy for instance, not smoking in outdoor and public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... food consumer this might be even worse as they might continue buying unhealthy fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, regarding, so, still, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15021459227 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37601621172 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519313304721 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.793863103 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.090909091 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219707379992 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790216331837 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386602085726 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127663006108 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133446260717 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.