The line chart below shows the change that look place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019.
The line graph depicts the information about three different types of crime in Panama town: burglary; car theft and robbery in during 10 years, between 2010 to 2019.
Overall the most striking fact emerged from the line chart is that, the line of robbery was parallel during years, while crime of housebreaking was gradually decline and car theft's line fluctuated.
To begin with , in 2010 all three types of crime like robbery, burglary and theft , the number of incident were 500; 2700 and 3600. Between 2010 2010 robbery and vehicle theft were stable, however, crime of housebreaking was increasing also decline next to your like 3600 and 3200 incidents in Panama City. We can see that incident of house breaking in next 3 years had been rocketing down from 3200 to 1000, while, in same years crime of car stolen was minimal changed just 2700 the years of 2013 to 2015.
According to chart, the line chart shows that, housebreaking and robbery were parallel in last four year such as robbery 600 incidents and burglary 1200 in 2019. Lastly, the number of car incident had been increasing during 2015 to 2019 such as from 2100 to 2500 events.
- Some people feel that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime Others feel that the circumstances of an offence should be taken into account when deciding on a punishment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Full time university students spend a lot of time studying however they should perform other activities too To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The table below shows Top 10 countries with largest population in 2019 and how it is projected to change by 2100 42
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by In two countries
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by In two countries 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... car thefts line fluctuated. To begin with , in 2010 all three types of crime ...
^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hefts line fluctuated. To begin with , in 2010 all three types of crime like r...
^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f crime like robbery, burglary and theft , the number of incident were 500; 2700 ...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... crime like robbery, burglary and theft , the number of incident were 500; 2700 a...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 2010
...cident were 500; 2700 and 3600. Between 2010 2010 robbery and vehicle theft were stable, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
... down from 3200 to 1000, while, in same years crime of car stolen was minimal changed...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...car stolen was minimal changed just 2700 the years of 2013 to 2015. According ...
^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g 2015 to 2019 such as from 2100 to 2500 events.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33578680534 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4007250182 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.285714286 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262531459077 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128131114622 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552161018769 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172358863526 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387833711709 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.