All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
I disagree with the given statement. It states that it is better to use employee feedback instead of hiring consultants, there are several factors which are not considered while suggesting that employee feedback should be considered insted of hiring consulting firms.
It would be appropriate to say that employees have better understanding about the internal working of the company, as compared to that of a consulting firm because the consulting firm would only have limited information about the company, as much as provided by the concerned authority or from documents.
Also, it is plausible to say that the consulting firm would have considerable amount of experience, gained by working with other companies and this experience might be useful for the client. It would also help the client avoid some structural of financial mistakes which might have been unavoidable if the company would have purely considerd the suggestions and feedback provided by the company's employees.
Moreover, the company's administration might suspect that the staff/employees would provide information/suggestions which might be some how advantageous to them, creating a conflict of intrest. Thus, it becomes important for the company to have an opinion of a third party.
Though, it might be appropriate to rely on some of employee's suggestions, it is favoured to take help from a consulting firm, as it is the investor or the owner whose intrests and capital are very much important for the company and its survival. Thus, ultimately the investor's intrests and suggestions should be favourd upon all.
One might also argue that since employees are better aware of the company's problems or issues, they can better point out issues and provide appropriate suggestions.
To conclude, I would say that hiring appropriate third party consultants is a better decision compared to considering employee's suggestions. Further, I would say that the employee's suggestions should be considered upto certain extent and could be shared with the consulting firm for better analysis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 53
- some people say advertising is extremely success cult in persuading us to buy things Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it 67
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 67
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: SOME_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somehow'?
Suggestion: somehow
... information/suggestions which might be some how advantageous to them, creating a confli...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 44, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the employees') or simply say ''some employees''.
Suggestion: some of the employees; some employees
...ugh, it might be appropriate to rely on some of employees suggestions, it is favoured to take hel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, third, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45482866044 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13041177447 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479750778816 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5836636459 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.916666667 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285231569209 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119712162922 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456912483375 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150888565122 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042940642545 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.