Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In nation scale, there are such an enormous amount of problems that should be solved immediately. Even in this situation, I disagree with the argument that the governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
First of all, the predicted problem that can recognize in present normally being bigger in future. For example, coronaviruses are big issue nowadays, and the critical situation of America is parially originated from the scarcity of initial quarantine. Since its spreadability is significantly high, the significance of that virus can be reduced with quick initial quarantine. However, the country like America, which have grand land size, it is hard to quarantine everywhere. In contrast, the country like South Korea, which have small land size, it is relatively easy to quarantine perfectly. Although this is small difference initially, the gap is being larger and larger like snowball. Everybody understand that the quarantine everywhere intially is such an onerous work, but if it is performed, than the coronaviruses may be blocked with relatively less effort. Thus, the government should consider about the forecasted problem.
Moreover, even the early resolution of the expected problem can reduce the cost need to solve it. It can also confirmed from the abovementioned example: coronaviruses. The cost need for perfect initial quarantine is definitely smaller than the cost that the America should pay for the nowadays devastataion. In addition, Vaccine can be one of the good example. Before Vaccine, the government is damaged from the disease by known viruses in perspective of cost to solve that proble, and even in perspective of human resources. After Vaccine is being mandatory, which need the rather high amount of commercial resource from government, the cost to solve that problem is being noticeably reduced, and regular vaccination is being mandatory for every newborn children in many countries. Therefore, the government should consider about the expected problem
In summary, even it is hard to address the immediate problem for the government, they should account at least for few important anticipated problems. This may bring positive results to the government in perspective of the significancy of the problem and the cost to solve the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Argue 99 The following is a recommendation from the business manager of Monarch Books Since its opening in Collegeville twenty years ago Monarch Books has developed a large customer base due to its reader friendly atmosphere and wide selection of books on 88
- Argue 56 The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc.“A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that o 82
- Argue 157: The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Top Dog Pet Stores.“Five years ago Fish Emporium started advertising in the magazine Exotic Pets Monthly. Their stores saw sales increase by 15 percent after their ads began appe 63
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 38
- Issue 114: Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position y 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...ation scale, there are such an enormous amount of problems that should be solved immed...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ognize in present normally being bigger in future. For example, coronaviruses are big iss...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 699, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'understands'.
Suggestion: understands
...ger and larger like snowball. Everybody understand that the quarantine everywhere intially...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'confirm'
Suggestion: confirm
... the cost need to solve it. It can also confirmed from the abovementioned example: corona...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, at least, for example, in addition, in contrast, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40700808625 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96242479251 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493261455526 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8103666179 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284695710647 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094184201456 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114591472528 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224130185297 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132180731514 0.0667264976115 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.