The consumption of the world’s resource (oil and water, etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions?
Nowadays, advancement in science, technology and communication has been changed people’s lifestyle. As a result of overcrowding the fast pace of life, people use a wide range of facilities which have consumed resources like water, oil and gas. Therefore, the consumption rate is increasing significantly around the world.
There are a lot of reasons which need to be taken into consideration. Firstly, since the world’s population is increasing, demand for goods is rising as well. Thus, a vast range of goods should be produced and producers are more likely to use natural resources exceedingly. Secondly, speed and saving time play a vital role in individuals’ life. Therefore, people are willing to use electrical and household goods. Moreover, they consume world’s resource more and more. Thirdly, new form of transport facilitate traveling. Consequently, people would rather to travel regardless of how it causes irreparable damage to the environment and natural resources. Finally, from an agriculture perspective, some farmers do not gather in the harvest at harvest time because they want to sell their products in a short time and gain more money. Therefore, fields were watered too much in order to catch up on time.
Governments should enforce strict laws to use renewable energy resource in manufactures and big companies. For instant, solar energy can be used. Schools are able to provide effective solutions. Children are taught to preserve the environment and not be the consumer from an early age. In addition city planners and transport officials must replace fossil fuels with gas or oil. Meanwhile, agriculture bank should impose hefty fines on farmers who break the laws.
To conclusion, one day world’s resource will run out. As a result, we should try to use this resources economically because our children need natural resources to continue their life.
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past What are the main reasons for it Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think it is better to choose friends who always have same opinions as them Other people believe it is good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both this views and give your own opinion 56
- A friend is expecting you to stay with him in two weeks time, but unfortunately you forgot that you have a business trip at the same time.Write letter to friend-apologise and say that you cannot come to visit-explain why you will not able to visit-suggest 73
- You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contained some information about your town that is incorrect Write a letter to editor of the magazine In your letter Correct the information in the article Explain why it is important
- The consumption of the world s resource oil and water etc is increasing at a dangerous rate What are causes and solutions 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...t be the consumer from an early age. In addition city planners and transport officials m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... out. As a result, we should try to use this resources economically because our chil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99324137503 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653198653199 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3222028058 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9523809524 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174940681695 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450693114453 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627526942676 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110552237028 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592565629654 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.