All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Many companies have a predilection to hire outside consultants to suggest and improve the management system by making it more efficient and robust. A efficient system not only helps to select better candidates suitable for the job but also helps the company reduce the time devoted in the recruitment process. I agree with this premise and would justify my points with 2 reasons.
It is often tedious for a company specialising in developing and innovative cutting edge technology to devote a lot of time in managing the hierarchy of the organisation. It can certainly become very cumbersome for the management to take care of all employees, which could lead to dismal performances of employees, no work life balance. So to handle all these issues, they should hire a consultant from outside who vould help declutter the whole organsisational mess, give a new and fresh perspective on how to operate and make things much more systematic. For example, a company unable to provide facilities and perquisites to its employee's, could use a consultant and help the company allot a budget for the perks to be provided to every employee. This way by making a budget, the employees get reassurance that the company is willing to listen and also the company makes the system much more efficient by not losing their time on the research and development sector.
When the office management is suffering from office politics and no job is being done satisfactorily, the company starts losing credibility and progress gets stunted. At this time, hiring an outside consultant seems a viable choice. Although it may incur cost, the asset purchased would help rejuvenate the system, idetify the loop holes, be able to identify the employees who were meddling with money and taking the companies profits for their own rejoice. This way the organisation would be restored to its former glory and there will a sense of trust again between the team manger and his subordinates. Therefore, the incurred cost helps to uplift the whole company and improve its functioning as a whole.
Many companies do listen to the employees, but many employees feign thier interest and are disngenuous with their plans. They do not really care for their co-employees or for the company but themselves. They keep fawning their bosses and are lazy with their work. If the company listen to these types of employees then, the company would not improve and make the whole system useless.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 66
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 76
- Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant decrease from prior years in expenditures for dormitory and classroom space mo 59
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...by making it more efficient and robust. A efficient system not only helps to sele...
^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...y should hire a consultant from outside who vould help declutter the whole organsis...
^^^
Line 6, column 573, Rule ID: MANGER_MANAGER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'team manager'?
Suggestion: team manager
...will a sense of trust again between the team manger and his subordinates. Therefore, the in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04914004914 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78729575424 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53316953317 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9389542017 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.882352941 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467326460936 0.243740707755 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144993348724 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082733735548 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286216023439 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430419333303 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.