spend money on the internet or in transportation TPO 53
Should governments spend money to imporve the interent access or public transportation? This is a controversial question. Some think it is better to invest in the public transportation because this might make people's life much easier. Although I understand their point of view, I wholeheartedly believe that governments should use the money that they have to evelove the internet access for several conspicous reasons.
One of the reasons why money should be spent to develop the interent access is because it helps people to learn. Unlike before, people today search for the information more than before, so by spending on improving the internet makes knowledge more accessable for those who despritaly want to learn. For example, let's say there is a lady who wants to do research about African animals in her biology class. So if this lady has an essay access to the internet, she will probably find a lot of information and facts that make her paper more interesting. In addition, she will learn from reviewing verious topics that she does not need to include in her porject. If this lady does not have access to the interent, she will not broaden her harizon, and also she will probably spend a tremendous amount of time looking for the information from reading books. Although some people think investing money in transportation would make people's lives easy because they can move around without having any troble, using the money the govenments have will assisst people to aquire more knowledge. Because of this, speding on the interent access is critical.
Another reason for focusing in developing the interent access is that it has a econcomical values. People use the interent everyday for different things such translating, learning, making money and etc. Research has been done on 1500 well-known companies such as Microsoft and Gooogle about how the internet hept them to increase their profit. The reserachers found out that 70% of the companies owners said that they would not have that huge success if they did not have the interent. If these companies had not had access to this precious tool, they would not have earned that huge revenue. Even though people might use interent unwasily and that lead to weast of time, others know how to utilized very well and benefit from it. Thus, the interent is vital to companies to increase their porfits.
To sum up, governments should use the money to improve access to the interent rather than using it for developing the transportation. This is because it not only helps people learn and reduce the ilitracy rate, but also it allows companies to earn a high income.
- wearing a uniform 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- burning mirror 73
- tpo 43 80
- spend money on the internet or in transportation TPO 53 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ping the interent access is that it has a econcomical values. People use the inte...
^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...comical values. People use the interent everyday for different things such translating, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...uch translating, learning, making money and etc. Research has been done on 1500 well-kno...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99545454545 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61786614259 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497727272727 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.422331607 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9523809524 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135718931778 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443403568712 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603918585139 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977737738275 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685556141205 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.