Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

The world is in the age of information and technology, so many poeple say that the government should spend more money on internet access than to in public trasportation. However, I am totally disagree with these people, and I think that It is important for government to spend more money in public transportation than Internet access. I think this way for two reasons.

Firstly, improvement of public transportation is more important than Internet. Internet has the alternatives, but public transportation has no alternatives. People use internet for the virtual communication and access the information. However, for communication and information there are alternatives, such as letters, telegrams for the communication and books, journals, and magazines for information. On the other hand, there is no alternatives for the public transportations. For instance, we may send mails in email or letters, but how can we send physical materials? It is possible to send a chair ten kilometer away by internet? The answer is no, it is not possible. To send physical materials we need to use cargo or currier services, and for this services we need public transportation. The example shows us that public transportation has no other alternatives, but internet has. Thus, improvement of public transportation is more important.

Secondly, poeple cannot avoid public transportations, and a sophisticated transportation system make the people's life easier and more comfortable. For example, poeple need to go their working places. To go working places people need to use public transports. However, many job is now internet based, but maximum job are not. Poeple need to present physically at their job in most of the cases. Take another example, we can see different places of the world, but just watchig cannot fulfill our thirst of travelling. Travelling physically is not as like as travelling internet. The examples shows us that we cannot avoid physical transport, even if we have highest speed internet connection. Hence improvement of public transportaion is preferable than the Internet.

In conclusion, internet is important because it helps us to communicate and access us to information. However, we cannot ignore public transportation, it is like our basic needs. Therefore, I think government should spend more money to improve public transport than internet access.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2023-07-21	Take	70	view
2023-04-08	younessam	70	view
2023-03-13	Mohf89	70	view
2023-03-13	saharmnd	76	view
2023-03-13	saharmnd	76	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user Hasan1613 :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ic trasportation. However, I am totally disagree with these people, and I think that It ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no alternatives'?
Suggestion: there are no alternatives
...nes for information. On the other hand, there is no alternatives for the public transportations. For ins...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...als? It is possible to send a chair ten kilometer away by internet? The answer is no, it ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 751, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... use cargo or currier services, and for this services we need public transportation....
^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...sticated transportation system make the peoples life easier and more comfortable. For e...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'many jobs'.
Suggestion: many jobs
...need to use public transports. However, many job is now internet based, but maximum job ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...ke as travelling internet. The examples shows us that we cannot avoid physical transp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...ot avoid physical transport, even if we have highest speed internet connection. Hence improv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 692, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...have highest speed internet connection. Hence improvement of public transportaion is ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43243243243 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35422283261 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456756756757 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6470686129 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3076923077 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2307692308 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366138804144 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119461509498 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11909939518 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26281631923 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786803255998 0.0645574589148 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.