Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Public transportation has always been an important backbone of cities. However, we are now entering a society which relies more on the Internet. I think that it is more necessary for governments to support Internet access rather than public transportation.
First, as far as I'm concerned, improving Internet access is actually more cost-effective than the other. While sometimes they serve the same purpose, renovating public transportation requires more amount of money since it includes building or purchasing extensive hardware and labor. For instance, if the government wants to construct a new subway route, they may need to spend money on setting up construction sites, employing workers or buying new trains. On the other hand, cost for improving Internet access, which only requires equipment with smaller sizes and a small pool of intelligent workers, is less expensive.
Furthermore, Internet can serve as important tools which public transportation cannot substitute for, however in contrast, public transportation can be easily replaced by Internet services from many aspects. For example, the revolution of the Internet has fascinated the trend of adapting to a more flexible working style. That is, many people shift to working from home, by which they do not have to spend any time on commuting to different places. This has certainly decreased the demand of public transportation.
Last but not least, reliance on Internet services has been surging up nowadays. Therefore, a nation can effectively stand out if they foster its citizens Internet knowledge and usage. What's more, Internet services can enhance people's life quality, which can thus encourage them to pursue things that will benefit the whole society. A common example is that some poor people living in rural places will spend less effort on traveling through far distances in order to buy necessities. By using the Internet, all they need to do is stay inside, click on buttons, and wait for goods to appear. Hence, they can save time on trying to improve their economic status and paying back to the society.
To wrap up, I believe that spending money on improving Internet access is much more essential than working on public transportation.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 88
- TOFEL TPO52 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 90
- Problems of sending human to Mars 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...lic transportation. First, as far as Im concerned, improving Internet access is...
^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... citizens Internet knowledge and usage. Whats more, Internet services can enhance peo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31638418079 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87889559298 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59604519774 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4658783705 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384665754699 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11711057993 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863759861981 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244158977953 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794130377384 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.