Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
These days, the selection of studying fields of higher education students has been having massive impacts on their future careers. While some people seem to advise students to focus on the fields with future jobs, I personally that agree those students should concentrate on researching areas based on their talents and interests.
On the one hand, following the fields related to talents and interests provides students some advantages. The first advantage is the high chance of success in future careers. By concentrating on things that they are good at and fascinated, passionate students tend to manage their academic problems better than unmotivated students, which improves their confidence and enhances the latter achievement. Second, since students focus on favorite subjects in which they have an aptitude, those students have more motivation to pursue their areas. For example, with the strength and hobbies of educational areas, pedagogical students are always interested in novel methods for improving teaching and learning skills, which significantly motivates them accomplishing their work.
On the other hand, the selection of studying areas of college students based on future jobs makes benefits for their careers. First, that choice allows one to increase the work opportunities, being the massive concern of graduating students. Because of attending activities related to future jobs actively, senior students easily find out accordant jobs. In addition, the fields involving the available jobs accommodate students to quantify those jobs. If students accumulate experiences through extra-curricular activities related to the availability of jobs, they can fulfill their works better and succeed quickly than the rest of the students.
In conclusion, although focusing on the areas related to future jobs has benefits of seeking work opportunities and fulfilling the jobs, the choice of fields based on students’ talents and interests have significant meaning with their success and happiness in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-14 | vananh1608 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71287128713 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86852414385 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534653465347 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8264749136 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.153846154 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362662614877 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1401604268 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901039987928 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246301704495 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562739568533 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.