The table below shows the results of a 25-year study on the use of bicycles in Britain by age and gender.
The given table compares the information on how much a bicycle was used (in miles) by both the sexes across different age groups over a period of 25 years in Britain.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the amount of distance covered by all the cyclists as a whole decreased gradually over time. However, boys in the teenage group came out to be the ones who used bicycles the most among all the other groups.
According to the given illustration, at the start of the period, boys below 10 traveled nearly twice the distance(32 miles) covered by the girls of the same group. However, the number in miles fell sharply and plunged to only 16 each by the end of the period. Also, boys and girls 11 to 17 years old showed a noticeable difference, as the latter covered just one-fourth of the distance marked by the former during the first year of survey, but steadily both the genders lost their passion to reach finally to half of the initial value.
On the contrary, whilst females(18-59) started losing interest before leveling off at 20 miles, the opposite sex quadrupled bicycle usage and rose to 80 miles in the 25th year. On the other hand, a dramatic plummet was witnessed after a decade in the case of an aged group(65 and above) which slipped the value lower by 50%. That shows a reduction in human stamina with progression of age.
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment 84
- Pie chart showing minutes spent per day on leisure activities in the Uk in 1961 78
- The pie charts compare the expenditure of a school in the UK in three different years over a 20 year period 84
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, so, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67219917012 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44183732361 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630705394191 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.039227883 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.111111111 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240868718582 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823923693781 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839799634341 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139073671191 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898483193707 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.