Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It's a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration.
Recently the phenomenon of exploring space has sparked a heated debate. In this connection, there are several avenues by which this project is received finance. Although contested by many that the matter of governments' investments on traveling to space is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I hold the view that exploring space is not worth enough to be supported financially by governments, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, if governments dedicate money to a poor family, they won't have enough money to pay for space exploration, which seems to waste money. To be more specific, in today's sophisticated world, the public deal with the financial crisis in their lives harder because of rising inflation; hence, a government should handle their demands. According to my own experience, I have worked in a charity organization, so I am familiar with a whole raft of difficulties that poor people face. There are countless families without an appropriate home to live in, and they suffer from nutrition deficiency since they cannot afford food. Accordingly, governments should allocate money to solve these crucial difficulties instead of exploring space, which is not helpful for the public.
Secondly, governments waste money by funding space travel as long as protecting people from getting sick needs a tremendous amount of money, which become practical with the financial aid of governments. To illustrate, diseases have expensive either treatments or protection; however, governments' funding on medications can rescue countless people who cannot cope with drugs' expenses. For example, the medicine cost of cancer is high, so much so that many people prefer to die instead of paying for treatments, such as pills, injections, and drugs. If governments dedicate funds for cancer treatments, the rate of death will decrease significantly since the public can deal with their illness effectively when they use suitable drugs.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that governments waste money by investing in space travel. Not only do governments have enough money to support families with low income, but also many people do not experience a lack of expensive medicine.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-08 | wxr031 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | meliiw_amd | 90 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | noushinhaddad | 76 | view |
| 2020-10-17 | sajib | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | zg1122 | 76 | view |
- As a final course to graduate which professor will you choose The one you used to sign up for courses or the one you have never learned from before 88
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 88
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students age14 18 improve their teaching It is considering two plans which one do you prefer Choose a small group of excellent teachers these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional tra 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Professor should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take at least one class that teaches the culture of a country other than their own 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperience a lack of expensive medicine.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38797814208 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97798164706 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3639160451 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.466666667 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363801370337 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122123880634 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880128059534 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22729176809 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038278727598 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.