the graph shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, suger and sweets, and cabonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 in US
The line graph illustrates the change in price of three types of food product in USA from 1979 to 2009 and the overal trend of Consumer-price index dring over 30-year period.
Overall, it is clear that the price increased fo three food product groups, despite various slightly fluctuations. Besider, only the price of fresh fruits and vegetables increased higher than the consumer-price index.
All the lines of graph have similar strating piont in 1979 at aproximate 65. The avarage customer price rose steadily from aroud 65 in 1979 to over 200 in 2009. The figure of two food products: sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks show similar trends. Although their prices also rose, they were consistently below the consumer-price index after 1985. During 30-reserch year, the price of suger and sweets reach a peak at 200 in 2009, compare with just over 150 of carbonated dricks figure.
The price of fresh fuirts and vegetables fluctuanted and increased slighly at about 90 in the first four years. After that this figure increased dramaticaly and finished at 340 on the index in 2009
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-22 | anhnatss123 | 78 | view |
- e 11
- the line graph shows the percentage of traveller to England who visit to four different places in Brighton between 1980 and 2010 84
- the line graphs show the differentce on income in five country between 1978 and 2008 73
- the graph shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables suger and sweets and cabonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 in US 78
- the line graph shows the amount of money spend on books in Germany Italia France and Italia between 1989 and 2005 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of two food products: sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks show similar trend...
^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and finished at 340 on the index in 2009
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02762430939 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64151960727 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60773480663 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9935706904 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243062413909 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09541693481 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507593331463 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141857711682 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026568269847 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.