PROPOSITION: Some people think governments should spend money on measures to save languages with few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. PROMPT: Discuss both views and give your opinion.
language is evolving in every era in accordance with the industrialization there are new words formed and others neglected. it has been argued that, other individuals believed that the administration must imperatively save languages that is in the brink of extinction, but is still used by few people. While other individuals opposed to the said notion and believes that it is a waste of budget in preserving a language spoken by few people. The writer will discuss both views and an opinion will be added to the later part of essay.
On one hand, languages both written and spoken by minority reflects the cultural diversity of a nation. it is, the inculcated ways of communicating since from the beginning of time of a place, hence it historical value should be preserved by means of funding a certain group of people to reverse the language from dying out. In addition, the stronger the cultural diversity and preservation of the nation, the powerful the country is. just like for example the dominance of the american culture and language on filipinos after they invaded the archipelago, even though that the Philppines has gained its independence from the americans, still the filipinos adapted the language unknowingly due to its influential power. Ergo, if the languages of the minorities will be eradicated , therefore, it is a weak nation, thus language preservation and influence is a power of a nation.
On the other hand, some individuals believed that preserving a language is a waste of time and money, there are far more present problems in the nation that needs to be acted fast, like healthcare, education, and unemployment inflating rates. communications in the past is no longer vital to the means of today’s world thus, diverting funds from the local government to preserve a dying language is off, no use. Moreso, people can survive adapting the new form of language than the past so, why the effort. just like the millenial language that are useful in todays world and the globalized terms that are used by many through the product of globalization. thus, the vital issues of the nation must be addresed immediately, minor language is unimportant.
In this crossroad of thought, the writer believes that preserving the cultural identity of a nation is a must. The allocation of budget in every problem of the nation should be properly distributed and use on its purpose. Furthermore, being influenced by other countries is not bad, it is accepting and respecting the new norms of society, but neglecting ones root of languange is a form of faithlessness in its country.
In conclusion, with all the points given, the writer supports and finds it vital to preserve the languange spoken by few people, to embody the power of a nation and patriotism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-23 | divine1990 | 61 | view |
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- TASK ONE The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- PROPOSITION Some people think governments should spend money on measures to save languages with few speakers from dying out completely Others think this is a waste of financial resources PROMPT Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
language is evolving in every era in acc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Language
language is evolving in every era in accordance ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... new words formed and others neglected. it has been argued that, other individuals...
^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...cts the cultural diversity of a nation. it is, the inculcated ways of communicatin...
^^
Line 5, column 780, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ges of the minorities will be eradicated , therefore, it is a weak nation, thus la...
^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Communications
...tion, and unemployment inflating rates. communications in the past is no longer vital to the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a dying language is off, no use. Moreso, people can survive adapting the new form...
^^
Line 7, column 509, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
...guage than the past so, why the effort. just like the millenial language that are us...
^^^^
Line 7, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...language that are useful in todays world and the globalized terms that are used b...
^^
Line 7, column 660, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...y through the product of globalization. thus, the vital issues of the nation must be...
^^^^
Line 9, column 356, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...he new norms of society, but neglecting ones root of languange is a form of faithles...
^^^^
Line 11, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'points'' or 'point's'?
Suggestion: points'; point's
...ountry. In conclusion, with all the points given, the writer supports and finds it...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 463.0 315.596192385 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02807775378 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96002398197 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48596112311 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0564405546 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7222222222 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180434676631 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590659589802 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361246902254 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976081589206 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518499018267 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.