The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps provide information about the comparison between Grange Park in 1920 and the same park now.
Overall, it can be seen that the Park of Grange underwent significant changes over the period shown.
Looking at the maps in more detail, it is evident that there were two entrances of park, from Arnold Avenue and from Eldon Street. These entrances remained unchanged over the period shown. There were seats and a stage for musicians in the west of the Grange Park in 1920, then, they were removed and an Amphitheatre was built for concerts. Also, there were two rose gardens which are located separately in the southwest of the park and the northwest of the park in 1920. The rose garden which is located in the southwest of the park was demolished and the other rose garden remained the same over the period shown. There were seats between rose gardens and entrances but they were removed.
Turning to the remainin information, it is clear that there were a fountain in the centre of the park but this was removed and a square shaped rose garden with four seats its around was built. In the northeast of the park, there were a rose garden and a pond for water plants. They were removed, a cafe and a Children's play area were built in the same place. There were a glasshouse and seats in the southeast of the park but they were demolished, a water feature was maden. Park facilities were improved, an underground car park which has a entrance from southeast to the park was built.
- The diagram below show how geothermal energy is used ti produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where elevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Write at least 150 words The chart below shows how frequenly people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and mak 61
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving their first punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 541, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...oved, an underground car park which has a entrance from southeast to the park was...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64150943396 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35216964294 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422641509434 0.561755894193 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0942939444 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6153846154 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.23076923077 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170402568836 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084398920763 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074217584909 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145793614015 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836562404763 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.