As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
In the given issue, the author has highlighted an important aspect of today's world regarding technology and its impact on human abilities. I believe that the issue raised by the author is fundamental and should be looked upon with a perspective that will bring a positive outcome for everyone. I partially agree with the author, but the benefits of technology can't be ignored at the same time.
We are living in an era where we are completely surrounded by enhanced technical goods around us, be it Smartphones, Television, Laptops, Ipads, or Alexa for that matter. The exponential growth of Technology is very amusing since it provides great facilities and ease at everything we do. This has become so helpful for people around the world to communicate at a single touch where there were Letters before which would take 5-10 days, get the news around the world on your TV where you relied only on radios before. This change in lifestyle has helped to bring people very close which was not possible without technological advancements. We can say the problem of communicating is definitely solved using technology.
Speaking of the human abilities to think for themselves, it's true common people require calculators nowadays, where our ancestors did the sums in a second. But, doing the calculations fast is not the sole definition of human ability. If we are engaged in the basic things, which can be delegated to the machines, the actual human work which is to "imagine" will take a sideline. Humans are meant to imagine and make things possible which will prove to be of benefit to society and the world. But, its true at the same time overdoing of things can make it a bane rather than a boon.
Maintaining a balance between our imaginations and our human ability to do things is what we should be looking forward to. Just because we can delegate the work to our machines, doesn't mean we should pass them with a simple 2+2 calculation. This would mean exploiting our own inventions. I think such technologies should be out of reach of children until they are capable enough to distinguish between taking advantage and disadvantage of a facility being provided. Doing so will help our human skills and abilities to thrive and at the same time take proper advantage of the Technology.
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather and lo 60
- For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five best selling cheeses at our newest store were domestic cheddar cheeses from Wisconsin Furthermore a recent surve 77
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 58
- Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances such as refrigerators and air conditioners that are almost twice as energy efficient as those 59
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... author, but the benefits of technology cant be ignored at the same time. We are ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... can delegate the work to our machines, doesnt mean we should pass them with a simple ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, second, so, i think, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91538461538 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84439885832 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55641025641 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.578759119 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173239934692 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556623162529 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384956498158 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103930278647 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019640322913 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... author, but the benefits of technology cant be ignored at the same time. We are ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... can delegate the work to our machines, doesnt mean we should pass them with a simple ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, second, so, i think, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91538461538 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84439885832 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55641025641 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.578759119 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173239934692 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556623162529 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384956498158 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103930278647 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019640322913 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.