Animal hunting for the production of medicines and clothing. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, humankind has developed new alternatives for the production of first aids and other livings. All is done by the help of advanced sciences. But what is the most effective method for the manufacturing of these items? I strongly agree with the statement and in this essay, I will support my opinion with the examples.
Firstly, most of the animal species which are used for the healing items and for wearing purpose are getting endanger because of over-hunting. For example, over-fishing of whales have increased the number small fish in the ocean which eats aquatic plants, in return, water is now low on oxygen levels. With this rate, more habitat will be lost as a consequence speeding up the extinctions of several other species. If more of the products from these animals will be produced at same rate, this will do more harm to the animal kingdom.
Another reason I agree with the statement is the advancement of technology. Take Nylon as an example, this is a wearable item which is a substitute of leather, a chemically invented cloth. With the modernization, medicinal items can be manufactured by replicating the genomes of different materials such as doping of cells of any living-thing. these procedures could help humanity to survive without hunting already endangered species of animals.
In contrast, some people believe that there are few therapies which science could not invent and that could only comes from the animals. As a result, they disagree with the argument.
Although, it is a common belief that remedy as well as wearing items are no longer dependent on animals. I personally think that science could help us in manufacturing of these valuables.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | phannhi1511@ | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...as doping of cells of any living-thing. these procedures could help humanity to survi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, well, for example, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07168458781 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83851054658 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594982078853 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.975132676 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189606831077 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049903636124 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453600529496 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789086311896 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532449210632 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.