Some people would say that parents should pay their children for small home duties (cleaning, washing dishes). Other would disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There two different approaches to the upbringing of children. On one side are those who believe that children should be paid for doing domestic chores, while others disagree. In this essay, I will consider both sides of the argument and then give my own opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, the idea to give money to youngsters might look appealing because it would encourage children to clean and do house duties. As well as this, they would earn their own pocket money and learn an important lesson of the value of labor. For instance, my younger brother hates to clean up his own room, and at the same time, he always needs some extra money to spend on cinema, food courts, etc. In this kind of cases, earning money for house chores would be an extra stimulation to do it.
However, it is possible to make the opposite case. This is because many parents would argue that paying children for small tasks such as washing dishes leads to spoiling the youth. This way they might start to act as if parents have to give them money for good behavior otherwise they can do whatever they want. Meanwhile, the main task of upbringing is to bring up responsible, diligent, and tidy people. They should not wait for an award for just regular daily tasks such as cleaning the floor or washing their own things.
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have their own merits, on balance, however, I think that parents should give pocket money to the youngsters but not as a payment for the household chores.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-07 | Mariamirabella | 81 | view |
- Human activity has damaged the environment all around the world Some people think that humans cannot stop damaging the planet where as other believe that we can alter our behaviour and prevent future damage Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 89
- Letter of complaint You recently stayed at a hotel for a conference with your company and there were several problems with your room Write to the hotel management to complain Include Where you stayed What the problems were How they can fix your complaints 67
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries But in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power has been encouraged Is this trend a positive or a negative development 56
- In many countries people are spending more time in their workplaces Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as a payment for the household chores.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, then, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63197026022 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28257631665 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576208178439 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9399000136 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8461538462 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280209041018 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948798539478 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690757723801 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16438746987 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02868381859 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.