The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The given bar chart details the value earned( in billion dollars) by a country in the export of five major products. Also, the linked table highlights the proportional change in the value during 2016 as compared to the last year.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the export has increased significantly in all the sections except the Gem and Jewellery, which observed a marginal dip. Despite a marked positive spike in textiles, the export value of petrol and the engineered goods remained at the highest spot.
According to the given illustration, with about 3% and 8.5% rise in the value, the petroleum products, and the engineerd goods led the chart by aquiring a peak value of more than 60 billion dollars. Turning to the agricultural and the textiles, the former grew with a slight uptick of only .81% reaching to half a value of the highest value products. While, with a dramatic spike(up by 15.24%), the latter climbed to nearly 32 billion dollar by the period end.
On the contrary, a sharp plummet of about 5.18% slipped gem and jewellery down to a value earned by textiles in 2016.
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 The bar chart shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The chart shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town a and b in two years 1960 and 2010 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...n bar chart details the value earned in billion dollars by a country in the export of f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ven illustration, with about 3% and 8.5% rise in the value, the petroleum product...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, well, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9170984456 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61691374267 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59067357513 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3370570837 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210804958051 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891609640375 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588293532406 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126403077132 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780520431529 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.