Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
No doubts, technologies had evolve dramatically during last decades, especially the use of internet which change peoples lifes all over the world. Interaction between individuals become easier because because of mobile applications. Those apps changed the nature of relationships among people. This essay will discuss the impact of using technologies in human relationships.
Internet make our lifes better, this is a general opinion, people nowadays are relying on internet and new technologies in different aspects of day to day life. The term Internet of things become familiar now which means a group of devices are connected to the internet to do a certain functions. The use of internet now is essential than anytime over people's health or life might be affected if there is no internet. Mobile applications now all over the world. Billions of people are using them to chat with each others, now you can send a very long message in one second time! Nobody can imagine that 30 years ago!
On the other hand the ease of use for mobile application for chat make relationships cold and indirect. A significant number of people now relying on mobile applications to communicate with others rather than finding a way to meet. In addition to that the rely on mobile phone change people's lifestyle to become lazy.
In conclusion the use of technology change the way of communication among humans, making relationships easier now than anytime ever, on the other hand the ease of life in general and in communications in particular changed the way of people dealing with each other. in my opinion the use of technologies make life better if we could moderate its side effects.
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vie 56
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or a negative development? 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'evolved'.
Suggestion: evolved
No doubts, technologies had evolve dramatically during last decades, espec...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'evolved'.
Suggestion: evolved
No doubts, technologies had evolve dramatically during last decades, espec...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: because
...ction between individuals become easier because because of mobile applications. Those apps chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ding a way to meet. In addition to that the rely on mobile phone change peoples lifestyl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... way of people dealing with each other. in my opinion the use of technologies make...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in particular, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05035971223 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87883970151 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3686138126 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332890548657 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116340850497 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777858154148 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218001443995 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606277233423 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.