The graph above compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web.
The line graph details the number of surfers(in thousand) visited two channels(music choice, and pop parade) on the internet over a period of 15 days.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a few fluctuations, pop parade lad the overall chart.
According to the given illustration, three times higher number was recorded at the pop parade compared to just 40 at the music choice. Further, the next day, whereas, the music choice lost half of the visitors, the other slipped just slightly in number. From here, whilst the visitors trebled at the music choice before plunging to the initial number on the 4th day, a 50% drop down dragged the pop parade to 60 visitors.
Moving on, with a few ups and downs, both channels observed a similar pattern prior to attaining 20 and 40 visitors respectively. After that, with a noticeable difference of 130 visitors compared to the other, a dramatic surge climbed the pop parade to more than 140 visitors by the end of the 11th day. Thereafter, a reverse trend allowed the music choice to surpass the pop with 40 more visitors. However, on the 15th day, the pop parade took over the peak value by doubling(160) the other.
- Some people believe that the government should spend more money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues in cities to make them better places to live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 78
- The Chart below shows participation in certain leisure activities by children in Australia 78
- Some people prefer to directly help or support people who need it in the local community however others prefer to give money to national or international charities Discuss both views and give your own opinion Write at least 250 words 89
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82524271845 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60396964881 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7747808374 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143531057582 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617127241972 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596734776894 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902294189953 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749847095622 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.