Nowadays nations are becoming more interesting and developing better thanks to the mixing
of different nationalities and culture. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, the mixture of different traditions might be both rewarding and problematic for a country. It is argued that this phenomenon made nations to be more revolutionized and interesting than before, however, I wholeheartedly disagree with the given assumption on basis of compelling reasons.
Admittedly, there are some sensible justifications explaining why I am of the opinion that the culture diversity in a region might possess dire consequences on a society. The first and foremost is that if receiving wide currency among people, some cultures may contributing factor in demolishing the noble one. On the account of the adverse effects of this issue, many people may cut off from their lineage values and ways of living which can spell trouble in the cultural poverty.Take the dominance of Arab culture on some Iranian as an good illustration, all this havoc on Iranian rich history provides is nothing but boost negative social norms toward Islam.
Irrespective of above context, there are rational grounds explaining my objection with the hypothesis claims that mixing cultures is the chief inducement of governments development. Actually this regard is flawed as I am of the view that this matter is relied upon the technology. To elaborate, thanks to the ubiquity of the state-of-the-art mass medias, the public are incline to change their considerations toward the obsolete values so as to enjoy updated with fast-paced world. Consequently, the more residents drive to have modern thoughts in exchange of the out-of-dated one, they would more willing to tackle their social problems, resulting in alluring other mammon to consider them as a role model.
This subject would bring about both economy climate enhancement and motivating tourists consider their novel traditions interesting.
To conclude, despite the fact that combination of varied original morals is going to create more expanded country, this is my firm conviction this phenomenon might have detrimental impacts on the domestic nations as well as the modern know how is the root motivator of the mentioned development .
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Nowadays nations are becoming more interesting and developing better thanks to the mixing of different nationalities and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- pie chart 11
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels Do you agree or disagree 11
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Take
...n spell trouble in the cultural poverty.Take the dominance of Arab culture on some I...
^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ance of Arab culture on some Iranian as an good illustration, all this havoc on Ir...
^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nsiderations toward the obsolete values so as to enjoy updated with fast-paced world. Co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t motivator of the mentioned development .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42553191489 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06993627354 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629179331307 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.2573145241 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.272727273 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9090909091 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134230740622 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442510623371 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397099766312 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674087851132 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450577966978 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.