In many countries laws are passed by politicians and elected officials. Individual citizens elect their leaders but they do not vote on laws directly.
Law making would be improved if more decisions were made by referendum. In other words, important decisions should be decided by individual voters and not by politicians.
Do you agree or disagree? Support your position and provide examples
Laws of a country are made for the public to follow and so the individual should get the right to vote for which laws should be placed in their country. I agree that the public should be allowed to vote on the important issues, as when the laws are decided with the help of a vote from the citizen it increases the confidence of the public in their politicians.
The importance given to a citizen in deciding the issues and the laws for a country increases the probability that when these laws are applied the individual would adhere to them instead of feeling that these rules were imposed on them. Passing laws through referendum also increases the confidence and likeability for the politician in the public's view as they feel more involved in making decisions for their country. This motivates the individual to be a more useful citizen and participate in their countries' issues.
Imposing laws forces the individual into following a law they may dislike hence it increases the chances of those laws being broken or the individual finding a way around it. Also, when laws are just passed through the politician's vote they usually do not favour the individual citizen as much as it favours the politician itself. It gives the ruling party an opportunity to place laws that would be beneficial for their political progress instead of thinking what would be advantageous for their citizens and the progress of the country as a whole.
For instance, when a certain political party is currently ruling the country they might change laws in their favour to increase the number of times as to which they can be reelected and become the President or the Prime Minister of the country or increase the duration for which they remain the head of the state. This would be specially disadvantageous for the public and the country if the particular politician is not beneficial for the country's development. As this would force the public to stay under their rule for an extended period despite their dissatisfaction.
Therefore, giving a citizen the power to vote for laws and important issues enhances a country's discipline and progress. Acquiring a vote from the public is similar to taking an informed consent before placing a certain law thereby reducing the probability of the individual going against the law or disapproving it.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- There have been major advances in technology over recent decades and this has led to significant improvements in people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 56
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, therefore, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93908629442 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73236052102 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434010152284 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0103540724 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.692307692 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3076923077 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402793590451 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178300637123 0.084324248473 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533503478035 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266130419163 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763018208469 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.