Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Every Individual has a unique talent, no matter what how diverse it might from the traditional practices it has to be respected. Similarly, one can choose what he want to pursue in life based on his intrest. Now-a-days there is alot of peer pressure in the society about what to study and how the person willl be judged based on it. Because of that one is getting distracting from his passion as he feels he will be judged by others. This is something completely unaccpetable. In the same stride, Educational institutions are hampering the freedom of student by not allowing them to pursue there their study in area of intrest. They try to convience the students by saying that he/she won't be successful in that field and distract them from their goals. This is something that cannot be accepted at any cost. I completely disagree which the interference of the educational institutions in this aspect.
There isn't any accepted way to measure a students intelligence. So, the educational organisations have no solid reference to say that one can't succeed in his arrange of intrest. Consider the example of the great mathematician Sir Ramanujan, he was fanatic about mathematics and hardly ever studied any other subject other than that. He has reached a stature where the entire world was waiting for his response to a mind boggling puzzles. He had attained this position because he followed his passion and received laurrels for it. Even, he was judged by his teachers that he was of no use when we was scoring marks only in mathematics. Later, it was proved wrong after his great success.
Having a zeal and getting chopped of from it makes you weaker that actualling failing in that subject. This hamperes the self confidence of the individual and he starts doubting his own abilities. That's something not acceptable. If a person is open to fullfill his passion, he can make the most of it, because his passion moves them in the path that mostly ends up reaching their goal. For example, Take the case of APJ Abdul kalam, the "Missile man of India". He came from a very poor background and was leaned towards making missiles which was not well among the society. He was trolled and bullied for taking up that profession. At the end, he was considered as an epitome in that field.
To conclude the educational organisations shouldn't influence students to take the subjects which they think are apt for them. Students should have the free hand to choose what they want. This issue has to be addressed immediately and it has to be sorted or else we might miss alot of great persons who might miss there aspirations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...cted. Similarly, one can choose what he want to pursue in life based on his intrest....
^^^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...l institutions in this aspect. There isnt any accepted way to measure a students ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...here isnt any accepted way to measure a students intelligence. So, the educational organ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...have no solid reference to say that one cant succeed in his arrange of intrest. Cons...
^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...d he starts doubting his own abilities. Thats something not acceptable. If a person i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...PJ Abdul kalam, the 'Missile man of India'. He came from a very poor ba...
^^
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... he was considered as an epitome in that field. To conclude the educational o...
^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... conclude the educational organisations shouldnt influence students to take the subjects...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 33.0505617978 200% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81456953642 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73221951239 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525386313466 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0122063763 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.7777777778 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.59259259259 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189497113656 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542509397358 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651247340326 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120332307931 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587342318401 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.