The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in four
different countries in 2008.
The table shows information about the percentage of expenditure which particular countries spending on different categories in 2008.
Overall, people in these countries spent their money mostly on cars and least on books. Also, China is reported to be the countries consuming cars most compared to others while Vietnam was opposite. However, the percentage of expenditure spent on books of the Vietnamese was the highest.
The figure for car consumption in China was the highest, at 28,91%, followed by that of Japan which was about 10% lower, at 18,8%. Similarly, computers were the kind of category which the Chinese spent on the second most, which was 16,23%, while that of Japan was threefold lower. However, China and Japan were the two least countries spending the least money on books, just 2,21% and 1,98% respectively.
In contrast with the two mentioned, both Thailand and Vietnam spent the least expense on cars, at around 16% while the percentage of expenditure these countries spent on books is reported to be higher than that of Japan and China, at 3,22% and 3,2% respectively. As for computers, Thailand was the second-highest county spending money on this category, which was 5,93% while that of Vietnam was 5,4%, the lowest compared to others.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-22 | LilFox1601 | 71 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in four different countries in 2008 57
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006 52
- The charts give information about world forest in six different regions 73
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... just 2,21% and 1,98% respectively. In contrast with the two mentioned, both Thailand a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, as for, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1359223301 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68730428092 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490291262136 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1127124652 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117168954386 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670390034992 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107787189743 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123258733477 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138429044033 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.