The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period Summarise

Essay topics:

The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
https://iotcdn.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/2018-06/RAT2-PT3-1.png

There are two charts given. The first one provides data about the money spent by Bparents in Britain on their children's sports from 2008 to 2014. While the second chart compares the amount of children who took part in football, athletics and swimming in Britain during the same period.

From the first chart it can be seen that in the beginning the average amount of money spend on children's sports was 20 pounds. Then there were a steady increase and the figure reached its peak of approximately 32 pounds by 2014.

Concerning the second chart which prowides the quantity of participants in three kinds of sport it can be clearly observed that football was the most widespread. About 7.9 millions children chose this sport in 2008 and more than 8.3 in 2014.

The figure of athletics was the lowest but in 2010 there was a rapid rise and it reched amark of 5 millions. Furthermore, it became more popular than swimming. The amount of children participating in swimming has changed due to a slow growth and by 2014 the number of partisipators consisted more than 2.5 millions children.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-18 Phuong1810 89 view
2023-07-22 Mei1312 84 view
2023-01-31 my220904 78 view
2022-11-15 khangoccho 84 view
2022-09-13 felixchen view
Essays by user _3nastya4_ :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, second, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81914893617 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55653593012 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.567123464 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401966731227 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147143173868 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109721719484 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244318863523 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127414557195 0.0819641961636 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.