Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, the Internet is the easiest and most common tool for gaining information which can be provided just by searching a key-word in different search engines. Some people believe that this vast amount of information can be very useful and valuable for individuals; others assume otherwise, believing having access to much information can produce different problems. Personally speaking, I think this gigantic amount of information can cause a lot of problems because of two reasons.
First, the excessive amount of information can cause confusion in people. People usually use search engines to get their information by searching their issues in them. After searching a key-word, search engines propose millions of websites about the subject. When people read this data, they find it incomplete or contradictory. Processing, judging and matching these data is a tedious and difficult task to do. As a result, the mind lose its concentration and become exhausted, and people become puzzled. For example, a while ago, I had a question about the basic books of philosophy. So, I searched my problem in Google to find the answer, and it suggested a million pages. Despite of that, I read tens of pages which had different opinions about the question. Some pages mentioned ancient philosophers’ books as basic reference; others contemporary ones, and some pages just raveled about philosophy. After great struggling, I finally gave up and referred to my friend who is studying Politic. He mentioned some philosophers and solved my problem. In sum, vast information can baffled people easily.
Second, a lot of information can create false beliefs in people. Vast range of information on the internet make it impossible to control and observe its correctness by specialists. Since the writers of some websites are not expert on what they are writing, they can intentionally or unintentionally spread false information. And other writers can copy this incorrect information and even spread it more. As a result, when people see same information in different sources, they will be convinced that the information is correct. For instance, I had a disagreement with my sisters about right ratio of weight to height in women. They asserted that height minus one meter give the women’s standard weight. In contrast, I told them that this is not right. Then, we searched the problem on the Internet, and site after site confirmed their claims. As I was confident about my assertation, I called my friend who is a doctor, and he confirmed my opinion and persuaded my siters. So, a lot of information can build incorrect conventions in people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-25 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | predatoros | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-21 | Prabesh Dhakal | 71 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | huy04 | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | Umme Abiha | 76 | view |
- TPO 21 Integrated Writing Task
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
- internal combustion engine and fuel cell engine 60
- TPO 33 Integrated Writing Task
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, then, while, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19953051643 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98208648844 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518779342723 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5280371905 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.037037037 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258067557686 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665944786432 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055369029613 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18575027441 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372398569935 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.